NCJC, Inc. v. WMG, L.C., 960 N.W.2d 58 (Iowa 2021)
Affirmed Anthony Ostlund’s client’s right to recover attorneys’ fees in a case that resolved multiple important legal issues related to fee awards in Iowa.
Halva v. Minnesota State Colleges and Universities, 953 N.W.2d 496 (Minn. 2021)
Submitted an amicus brief for Public Record Media in support of the appellant’s winning argument to the Minnesota Supreme Court about pleading damages for a Minnesota Government Data Practices Act claim.
Great Plains Educational Foundation, Inc. v. Student Loan Finance Corporation, 954 N.W.2d 844 (Minn. Ct. App. 2020), review denied (Mar. 30, 2021)
Reversed the trial court’s dismissal of fraud claims made by Anthony Ostlund’s client.
Rabbe v. Farmers State Bank of Trimont, 2020 WL 2312931 (Minn. Ct. App. May 11, 2020), review denied (July 21, 2020)
Affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of all lender liability claims asserted against Anthony Ostlund’s client.
Flattum v. Pro Tech Restoration, Inc., 2019 WL 6837003 (Minn. Ct. App. Dec. 16, 2019), review denied (Feb. 26, 2020)
Affirmed a jury verdict in favor of Anthony Ostlund’s client on his claim for breach of a pre-incorporation agreement to share profits in a new business.
Adherent Laboratories, Inc. v. DiPietro, 2018 WL 3520843 (Minn. Ct. App. July 23, 2018), review denied (Oct. 16, 2018)
Affirmed the trial court’s decision to deny the defendants’ motion to compel arbitration of claims made by Anthony Ostlund’s client.
Martin v. Marquee Pacific, LLC, 906 N.W.2d 65 (N.D. 2018)
Reversed the trial court’s dismissal of claims Anthony Ostlund’s client made for fraudulent transfer of real estate.
Camelot LLC v. AMC ShowPlace Theatres, Inc., 665 F.3d 1008 (8th Cir. 2012)
Affirmed summary judgment for Anthony Ostlund’s client that a purported option to extend a lease was unenforceable.
Brenny v. Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota, 813 N.W.2d 417 (Minn. Ct. App. 2012)
Affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of all claims made by the University of Minnesota’s former associate women’s golf coach against Anthony Ostlund’s client, the former headgolf coach.
Houseman v. Whittington, 2012 WL 4052896 (Minn. Ct. App. Sept. 17, 2012), review denied (Nov. 27, 2012)
Affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of shareholder claims asserted against Anthony Ostlund’s client.
North Valley, Inc. v. Valley Paving, Inc., 2011 WL 1546489 (Minn. Ct. App. Apr. 26, 2011)
Reversed the trial court’s dismissal of claims by Anthony Ostlund’s client that his co-shareholder was unfairly competing.
TRIAL COURT AND ARBITRATION WINS AND SETTLEMENTS
1800 Baxter County Road LLC v. Portillo's Hot Dogs, LLC, 2021 WL 1588745 (Minn. Dist. Ct. Mar. 30, 2021)
Represented a commercial landlord in a lawsuit to collect rent from a chain restaurant that continued to operate but refused to pay rent during the COVID-19 pandemic. Anthony Ostlund won summary judgment in one of the few judicial orders across the country - and possibly the first decision in Minnesota - determining a commercial tenant's obligation to pay rent during the pandemic.
Cedar Point SC, LLC v. Pei Wei Asian Diner, LLC, State of Minnesota, Hennepin County Court File No. 27-CV-18-17250 (2019)
Represented a commercial landlord in a breach-of-lease case and obtained over $1 million in awards for accelerated rent, late fees, interest, attorneys' fees and costs against the defaulting tenant.
Raitz Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a U.S. Sand & Gravel v. Blattner Energy, Inc., AAA Arbitration (2019)
Represented a subcontractor in an arbitration under the AAA Construction Rules to recover hundreds of thousands of dollars in payments that the general contractor was withholding. After an evidentiary hearing, the arbitrator awarded Anthony Ostlund's client nearly all of the damages it was seeking, plus interest and all of the attorneys' fees it paid for the case.
Family Business Dispute in Wisconsin (2018)
Represented the majority owners of a large agricultural company in Wisconsin in a shareholder dispute, which settled on a confidential basis after trial.
Twin City Fan Companies and Barry Family Litigation (2018)
Represented Melanie Barry and Twin City Fan Companies in well-publicized, multi-faceted litigation against Charles Barry, including a divorce proceeding in Florida, an arbitration in Minnesota regarding Mr. Barry’s employment agreement, and multiple shareholder lawsuits in Minnesota state court. The parties reached a settlement agreement after months of discovery and motion practice and the issuance of a favorable special litigation committee report.
Kieran’s Irish Pub First Avenue LLC v. Camelot LLC, State of Minnesota, Hennepin County District Court File No. 27-CV-14-17485 (2016)
Defended the owner and developer of Mayo Clinic Square (formerly Block E) in Downtown Minneapolis in a lease dispute regarding our client’s redevelopment of the building and calculation of a tenant’s share of water bills. The parties reached a settlement agreement shortly before trial.
Confidential AAA Arbitration (2015)
Pursued accounting malpractice claims against a Big Four accounting firm on behalf of a group of individual clients. Anthony Ostlund negotiated a favorable settlement for its clients after a two-week arbitration hearing.
Minneapolis Venture, LLC v. Minnesota Sports Facilities Authority, State of Minnesota, Hennepin County District Court File No. 27-CV-13-15247 (2013)
Represented the owner of the Downtown East property across from the Metrodome, which included a Plaza used for Vikings game-day concessions and events. To resolve a dispute over the Minnesota Sports Facilities Authority’s current and future use of the property, Anthony Ostlund negotiated a purchase agreement that required the Authority to buy the property for $17.1 million, $12.6 million more than its tax-assessed value.
St. Paul Pioneer Holdings, Inc. v. U.S. Bank National Association, State of Minnesota, Ramsey County District Court File No. 62-CV-08-2265 (2010)
Represented the owner of the historic Pioneer-Endicott building in Downtown St. Paul in a dispute over damages a long-time tenant had caused to the building. The case settled after the trial court entered a key ruling in favor of Anthony Ostlund’s client on the proper measure of its damages.