Skip to content
  • CAREERS
  • CONTACT US
Search
Close this search box.
anthony ostlund logo
  • PEOPLE
  • LITIGATION
    • APPEALS
    • COMPLEX COMMERCIAL LITIGATION
    • EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION
    • FRAUD AND FIDUCIARY DUTY
    • FINANCIAL LITIGATION
    • OWNER/SHAREHOLDER DISPUTES
    • PLAINTIFF CONTINGENCY CASES
    • PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE
    • REAL ESTATE LITIGATION
    • TRUSTS AND ESTATES LAW
  • SUCCESSES
  • NEWS
  • ABOUT
  • FEE ARRANGEMENTS
Menu
  • PEOPLE
  • LITIGATION
    • APPEALS
    • COMPLEX COMMERCIAL LITIGATION
    • EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION
    • FRAUD AND FIDUCIARY DUTY
    • FINANCIAL LITIGATION
    • OWNER/SHAREHOLDER DISPUTES
    • PLAINTIFF CONTINGENCY CASES
    • PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE
    • REAL ESTATE LITIGATION
    • TRUSTS AND ESTATES LAW
  • SUCCESSES
  • NEWS
  • ABOUT
  • FEE ARRANGEMENTS

“Create a clever title for an article discussing ChatGPT and its impact on Minnesota lawyers.” – Kathryn Campbell

  • May 10, 2023

Minnesota Lawyer and Finance & Commerce – Partner Content

Author: Kathryn Campbell

 

When I typed out the above request into ChatGPT, it instantly spit out the following pithy response: “ChatGPT: The Legal Assistant Minnesota Lawyers Never Knew They Needed.” I shared the response with a few of my colleagues to lighten up a busy weekday afternoon, but underneath the humor, a question emerged: does ChatGPT have a point? Do lawyers need ChatGPT?

 

Released in November 2022, ChatGPT is a generative artificial intelligence chatbot created by OpenAI, an artificial intelligence research laboratory. The premise for ChatGPT is simple: the user provides a prompt or question to the program, and ChatGPT generates a response, with its level of detail based in part on the parameters provided by the user.

 

ChatGPT has since become one of the primary water-cooler topics in the legal industry. Recently, professors at the University of Minnesota Law School published a white paper detailing a study in which the professors utilized ChatGPT to answer four final exams in constitutional law, employee benefits, taxation, and torts. See Johnathan H. Choi et al., ChatGPT Goes to Law School (Minn. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 23-03, 2023), https://ssrn.com/abstract=4335905. While ChatGPT may have passed the exams (albeit with less than flying colors—the chatbot averaged a C+ grade across the four exams), the study noted several deficiencies with the program, including ChatGPT’s failure “to go into sufficient detail when applying legal rules to the facts contained within exam hypotheticals” and properly spot issues, as well as its propensity to “go completely off-topic” for certain questions. Id. at 9-10. Despite ChatGPT’s limitations, the study concluded that it is likely that generative AI chatbots may become useful tools for practicing lawyers, such as by assisting lawyers with drafting of memos, overcoming writer’s block, and increasing efficiency. Id. at 11-12.

 

Ultimately, the results of this study, as well as the broader discourse around the use of ChatGPT by legal professionals, beg the question of if and how lawyers may integrate ChatGPT into their work. While elements of ChatGPT seem attractive—for example, the ability to generate memorandums and responses in minutes or to quickly recite the legal standard for summary judgment—ChatGPT should still be approached with caution, particularly when used in connection with client-related work.

 

Neither the Minnesota nor the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct explicitly prohibit the use of generative AI chatbots, but it is well-noted that lawyers owe their clients competent and diligent representation under these rules. To that end, and as frequently noted by ChatGPT critics, ChatGPT is imperfect; relying blindly on ChatGPT without the exercise of any human judgment or review could result in a poor outcome for a client.

 

Further, the use of ChatGPT implicates other concerns regarding the attorney-client relationship. For example, Rule 1.6 of the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct requires that attorneys keep client information confidential, absent the informed consent of the client or other extenuating circumstances for disclosure. In its Frequently Asked Questions, OpenAI states: “As part of our commitment to safe and responsible AI, we review conversations to improve our systems and to ensure the content complies with our policies and safety requirements.” In other words, when a lawyer inputs confidential client information into ChatGPT, such information is viewable by third parties. Without a client’s consent to use ChatGPT, a lawyer may therefore risk ethical exposure.

 

Finally, there is the question of whether work product generated by ChatGPT qualifies as attorney work product for purposes of privilege. Arguments exist for both sides. On the one hand, can a lawyer truly argue that the response generated by an AI chatbot constitutes that lawyer’s mental impressions and opinions? But to the contrary, is it not the practice of the modern-day lawyer to manifest their thoughts and impressions on the tools available to them, such as through online research databases like Westlaw and LexisNexis?

 

In sum, it is highly likely that generative AI chatbots such as ChatGPT may become another tool employed by lawyers in their daily practice to increase their productivity and efficiency. But, as with all new technology, lawyers should approach using these chatbots with caution to avoid harm to their clients or to their careers, such as by obtaining a client’s consent to use ChatGPT and carefully examining any work product created by ChatGPT. Otherwise, lawyers run the risk of violating their ethical obligations.

 

And before anyone asks—no, ChatGPT did not write this article for me.

 

Kathryn Campbell is a trial lawyer at the Minneapolis law firm Anthony Ostlund Louwagie Dressen & Boylan P.A. Kathryn’s practice involves advocacy in state and federal court for businesses and individuals and ranges from small-scale business disputes to broader matters involving constitutional questions.

 

View article as PDF here.

related attorneys

Loading...

Kathryn Campbell

related practice areas

Loading...
AO-logo-initials

90 SOUTH 7TH STREET, SUITE 3600
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402
P 612.349.6969       F 612.349.6996

 

© 2021 ANTHONY OSTLUND LOUWAGIE DRESSEN BOYLAN P.A.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

  • 651•312•6500
  • 651•312•6618
  • People
  • Litigation
  • Successes
  • News
  • About
  • Fee Arrangements
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • People
  • Litigation
  • Successes
  • News
  • About
  • Fee Arrangements
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • PEOPLE
  • LITIGATION
    • APPEALS
    • COMPLEX COMMERCIAL LITIGATION
    • EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION
    • FRAUD AND FIDUCIARY DUTY
    • FINANCIAL LITIGATION
    • OWNER/SHAREHOLDER DISPUTES
    • PLAINTIFF CONTINGENCY CASES
    • PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE
    • REAL ESTATE LITIGATION
    • TRUSTS AND ESTATES LAW
  • SUCCESSES
  • NEWS
  • ABOUT
  • FEE ARRANGEMENTS
  • PEOPLE
  • LITIGATION
    • APPEALS
    • COMPLEX COMMERCIAL LITIGATION
    • EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION
    • FRAUD AND FIDUCIARY DUTY
    • FINANCIAL LITIGATION
    • OWNER/SHAREHOLDER DISPUTES
    • PLAINTIFF CONTINGENCY CASES
    • PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE
    • REAL ESTATE LITIGATION
    • TRUSTS AND ESTATES LAW
  • SUCCESSES
  • NEWS
  • ABOUT
  • FEE ARRANGEMENTS
search
disclaimer
Linkedin
Join Our Email List

© 2021 ANTHONY OSTLUND LOUWAGIE DRESSEN BOYLAN P.A. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT