Skip to content
  • CAREERS
  • CONTACT US
Search
Close this search box.
anthony ostlund logo
  • PEOPLE
  • LITIGATION
    • APPEALS
    • COMPLEX COMMERCIAL LITIGATION
    • EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION
    • FRAUD AND FIDUCIARY DUTY
    • FINANCIAL LITIGATION
    • OWNER/SHAREHOLDER DISPUTES
    • PLAINTIFF CONTINGENCY CASES
    • PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE
    • REAL ESTATE LITIGATION
    • TRUSTS AND ESTATES LAW
  • SUCCESSES
  • NEWS
  • ABOUT
  • FEE ARRANGEMENTS
Menu
  • PEOPLE
  • LITIGATION
    • APPEALS
    • COMPLEX COMMERCIAL LITIGATION
    • EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION
    • FRAUD AND FIDUCIARY DUTY
    • FINANCIAL LITIGATION
    • OWNER/SHAREHOLDER DISPUTES
    • PLAINTIFF CONTINGENCY CASES
    • PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE
    • REAL ESTATE LITIGATION
    • TRUSTS AND ESTATES LAW
  • SUCCESSES
  • NEWS
  • ABOUT
  • FEE ARRANGEMENTS

DIRECTV, Inc. v. Imburgia: Confirming the Enforceability of Arbitration Clauses

  • February 8, 2016
February 8, 2016
Attorney At Law Magazine – Minnesota Edition
Author: Steven C. Kerbaugh

In DIRECTV, Inc. v. Imburgia, 136 S. Ct. 463 (2015), issued on December 14, 2015, the United States Supreme Court dealt another blow to class action lawsuits by enforcing an arbitration agreement and confirming the validity of class-arbitration waivers.  DIRECTV is an important case for litigators and transactional attorneys because it further underscores the extent to which the Supreme Court is willing to enforce arbitration agreements.

The DIRECTV action was commenced by customers seeking damages for early termination fees.  DIRECTV’s customer service agreement contained an arbitration provision and a class-arbitration-waiver clause providing that claims could not be joined or consolidated in arbitration.  The practical effect of such a provision is to force customers to personally incur significant fees litigating individual arbitration proceedings regardless of the expected amount of recovery.

California courts have previously found such provisions invalid.  In 2005, the California Supreme Court held that waivers of class arbitration in consumer contracts of adhesion involving small amounts of damages were unconscionable and unenforceable.  Discover Bank v. Superior Court, 113 P.3d 1100, 1110 (Cal. 2005).  The Discover Bank rule, though, was abrogated in 2011 when the United States Supreme Court held that it was an obstacle to the accomplishment congressional objectives embodied in the Federal Arbitration Act, which preempted the rule.  AT & T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333, 352 (2011).

The service agreement in DIRECTV provided that the Federal Arbitration Act governed the arbitration provision.  Seemingly inconsistently, it also provided that if the “law of your state” makes class-arbitration waivers unenforceable, then the entire arbitration provision is unenforceable.  The California Court of Appeal concluded that, despite the Supreme Court’s ruling in Concepcion, the class-arbitration waiver in the service agreement was unenforceable under California law.  It reasoned that just as parties are free to refer to the laws of different states in their contracts, they are also free to refer to California law as it would have been without the Supreme Court’s invalidation of Discover Bank.  The Court further held that the California law provision trumped the provision in the services agreement referring to the Federal Arbitration Act on the basis of two common law canons of contract construction:  (1) specific language governs general language, and (2) courts must construe ambiguous language against the drafter.

 

related attorneys

Loading...

related practice areas

Loading...
AO-logo-initials

90 SOUTH 7TH STREET, SUITE 3600
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402
P 612.349.6969       F 612.349.6996

 

© 2021 ANTHONY OSTLUND LOUWAGIE DRESSEN BOYLAN P.A.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

  • 651•312•6500
  • 651•312•6618
  • People
  • Litigation
  • Successes
  • News
  • About
  • Fee Arrangements
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • People
  • Litigation
  • Successes
  • News
  • About
  • Fee Arrangements
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • PEOPLE
  • LITIGATION
    • APPEALS
    • COMPLEX COMMERCIAL LITIGATION
    • EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION
    • FRAUD AND FIDUCIARY DUTY
    • FINANCIAL LITIGATION
    • OWNER/SHAREHOLDER DISPUTES
    • PLAINTIFF CONTINGENCY CASES
    • PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE
    • REAL ESTATE LITIGATION
    • TRUSTS AND ESTATES LAW
  • SUCCESSES
  • NEWS
  • ABOUT
  • FEE ARRANGEMENTS
  • PEOPLE
  • LITIGATION
    • APPEALS
    • COMPLEX COMMERCIAL LITIGATION
    • EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION
    • FRAUD AND FIDUCIARY DUTY
    • FINANCIAL LITIGATION
    • OWNER/SHAREHOLDER DISPUTES
    • PLAINTIFF CONTINGENCY CASES
    • PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE
    • REAL ESTATE LITIGATION
    • TRUSTS AND ESTATES LAW
  • SUCCESSES
  • NEWS
  • ABOUT
  • FEE ARRANGEMENTS
search
disclaimer
Linkedin
Join Our Email List

© 2021 ANTHONY OSTLUND LOUWAGIE DRESSEN BOYLAN P.A. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT