Skip to content
  • CAREERS
  • CONTACT US
Search
Close this search box.
anthony ostlund logo
  • PEOPLE
  • LITIGATION
    • APPEALS
    • COMPLEX COMMERCIAL LITIGATION
    • EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION
    • FRAUD AND FIDUCIARY DUTY
    • FINANCIAL LITIGATION
    • OWNER/SHAREHOLDER DISPUTES
    • PLAINTIFF CONTINGENCY CASES
    • PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE
    • REAL ESTATE LITIGATION
    • TRUSTS AND ESTATES LAW
  • SUCCESSES
  • NEWS
  • ABOUT
  • FEE ARRANGEMENTS
Menu
  • PEOPLE
  • LITIGATION
    • APPEALS
    • COMPLEX COMMERCIAL LITIGATION
    • EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION
    • FRAUD AND FIDUCIARY DUTY
    • FINANCIAL LITIGATION
    • OWNER/SHAREHOLDER DISPUTES
    • PLAINTIFF CONTINGENCY CASES
    • PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE
    • REAL ESTATE LITIGATION
    • TRUSTS AND ESTATES LAW
  • SUCCESSES
  • NEWS
  • ABOUT
  • FEE ARRANGEMENTS

Employer Arbitration Provisions with Collective-Action Waivers Tested at U.S. Supreme Court

  • January 22, 2018
January 22, 2018
Minnesota Lawyer – Sponsored Blog
Author: Steven C. Kerbaugh

There is currently an appeal pending before the United States Supreme Court that is sure to be of import for thousands of employers. Epic Systems Corporation v. Lewis involves the fundamental issue of whether the National Labor Relations Act’s (“NLRA”) protection for “concerted activities” bars enforcement of collective-action waivers in employment contracts.
If the Court concludes that it does, Epic would have the effect of allowing employees to bring class actions against their employers notwithstanding collective-action waiver provisions in their employment contracts. Such a conclusion would also serve as a notable departure from a significant line of Supreme Court precedent upholding collective-action waivers in favor of individual arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”).
In recent years, the Court has repeatedly invoked the FAA in upholding contractual provisions requiring individual arbitration and precluding class actions. For example, the Court held in 2011 that the FAA preempted a California judicial rule regarding the unconscionability of class-arbitration waivers in consumer contracts. AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011). The Court similarly concluded in 2015 that parties to consumer contracts could not contract around FAA preemption regarding class-arbitration waivers. DIRECTV, Inc. v. Imburgia, 136 S. Ct. 463 (2015). Epic, though, involves employment contracts and a legal ripple not present in prior cases – i.e., seemingly competing federal laws in the NLRA and FAA.
Although consolidated with two other actions, Epic gets its namesake from an action that originated in the United States District Court for the neighboring Western District of Wisconsin. Lewis v. Epic Sys. Corp., 823 F.3d 1147 (7th Cir. 2016). Software company Epic Systems required certain employees to agree to bring wage-and-hour claims against the company only through individual arbitration. The agreement did not allow for any type of collective action. Jacob Lewis, a technical writer at Epic, filed an action in federal court, contending that Epic had violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by misclassifying him and other technical writers so as to unlawfully deprive them of overtime pay. Epic moved to dismiss and to compel arbitration. Judge Barbara Crabb denied the motion, concluding that the arbitration clause violated the NLRA. Epic then appealed to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
The Seventh Circuit focused on Section 7 of the NLRA. That Section provides that “employees shall have the right . . . to engage in . . . concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection.” Analyzing the text, history and purpose of Section 7, and case law construing the provision, the Court concluded that Section 7’s “other concerted activities” language includes class legal remedies such as class action lawsuits. The Court concluded that Epic’s arbitration provision, insofar as it prohibited collective procedures, ran “straight into the teeth of Section 7” and was thus unenforceable.
Epic, however, argued that the FAA overrides the NLRA protection. In relevant part, the FAA provides that any contract “evidencing a transaction involving commerce to settle by arbitration a controversy thereafter arising . . . shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable . . . .” The Court disagreed that this provision of the FAA entitled Epic to enforce its arbitration provision.

 

related attorneys

Loading...

related practice areas

Loading...
AO-logo-initials

90 SOUTH 7TH STREET, SUITE 3600
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402
P 612.349.6969       F 612.349.6996

 

© 2021 ANTHONY OSTLUND LOUWAGIE DRESSEN BOYLAN P.A.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

  • 651•312•6500
  • 651•312•6618
  • People
  • Litigation
  • Successes
  • News
  • About
  • Fee Arrangements
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • People
  • Litigation
  • Successes
  • News
  • About
  • Fee Arrangements
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • PEOPLE
  • LITIGATION
    • APPEALS
    • COMPLEX COMMERCIAL LITIGATION
    • EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION
    • FRAUD AND FIDUCIARY DUTY
    • FINANCIAL LITIGATION
    • OWNER/SHAREHOLDER DISPUTES
    • PLAINTIFF CONTINGENCY CASES
    • PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE
    • REAL ESTATE LITIGATION
    • TRUSTS AND ESTATES LAW
  • SUCCESSES
  • NEWS
  • ABOUT
  • FEE ARRANGEMENTS
  • PEOPLE
  • LITIGATION
    • APPEALS
    • COMPLEX COMMERCIAL LITIGATION
    • EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION
    • FRAUD AND FIDUCIARY DUTY
    • FINANCIAL LITIGATION
    • OWNER/SHAREHOLDER DISPUTES
    • PLAINTIFF CONTINGENCY CASES
    • PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE
    • REAL ESTATE LITIGATION
    • TRUSTS AND ESTATES LAW
  • SUCCESSES
  • NEWS
  • ABOUT
  • FEE ARRANGEMENTS
search
disclaimer
Linkedin
Join Our Email List

© 2021 ANTHONY OSTLUND LOUWAGIE DRESSEN BOYLAN P.A. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT