Skip to content
  • CAREERS
  • CONTACT US
Search
Close
anthony ostlund logo
  • PEOPLE
  • LITIGATION
    • APPEALS
    • COMPLEX COMMERCIAL LITIGATION
    • EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION
    • FRAUD AND FIDUCIARY DUTY
    • FINANCIAL LITIGATION
    • OWNER/SHAREHOLDER DISPUTES
    • PLAINTIFF CONTINGENCY CASES
    • PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE
    • REAL ESTATE LITIGATION
    • TRUSTS AND ESTATES LAW
  • SUCCESSES
  • NEWS
  • ABOUT
  • FEE ARRANGEMENTS
Menu
  • PEOPLE
  • LITIGATION
    • APPEALS
    • COMPLEX COMMERCIAL LITIGATION
    • EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION
    • FRAUD AND FIDUCIARY DUTY
    • FINANCIAL LITIGATION
    • OWNER/SHAREHOLDER DISPUTES
    • PLAINTIFF CONTINGENCY CASES
    • PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE
    • REAL ESTATE LITIGATION
    • TRUSTS AND ESTATES LAW
  • SUCCESSES
  • NEWS
  • ABOUT
  • FEE ARRANGEMENTS

Complete Defense Against Suit Brought by Former Napster CEO

Anthony Ostlund wins dismissal of breach of contract claim brought by ex-Napster CEO

 

Client Issue

Our client, Best Buy, purchased Napster in 2008. In connection with that purchase, Best Buy entered into an employment and performance award agreement with Napster’s then CEO, Christopher Gorog. Nine months later, Mr. Gorog left his employment and entered into a separation agreement which preserved his right to earn a performance award under certain specific circumstances.

 

When our client sold a portion of Napster in 2011, Mr. Gorog sued under a variety of theories including a claim for breach of contract alleging that he was entitled to a full performance award based on a provision in the award agreement.

 

The Anthony Ostlund Approach

We believed that our client would benefit from an aggressive defense right out of the box. We filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim, claiming that even if what Mr. Gorog pled was true, he was still not entitled to relief under the terms of the Performance Award Agreement.

 

We argued that because left his employment long before the sale of Napster, he was only entitled to a prorated performance amount under the award agreement if Napster met the required performance metrics. We used our briefing and argument to demonstrate how Mr. Gorog’s interpretation of the contract would lead to absurd and illogical results.

 

Results Achieved

Both the federal district court and the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals agreed, finding that Mr. Gorog had failed to state a claim for breach of contract. The courts determined that because Mr. Gorog had not pled that Napster ever met performance metrics, he could not recover under the Performance Award Agreement.

 

For more on the Eighth Circuit ruling, click here.

 

Gorog v. Best Buy Co. Inc., Case No. 13-2231
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Back to All Successes  

“This was a case involving complicated and unique contract language. We were pleased that the district court and the Eighth Circuit agreed with our reading of the contract and dismissed Mr. Gorog's claims before our clients were forced to incur the expense of protracted litigation.”

 

– Brooke Anthony, attorney for Best Buy Co. Inc.

related attorneys

related practices

Contract Disputes

Back to All Successes  
AO-logo-initials

90 SOUTH 7TH STREET, SUITE 3600
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402
P 612.349.6969       F 612.349.6996

 

© 2021 ANTHONY OSTLUND LOUWAGIE DRESSEN BOYLAN P.A.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

  • 651•312•6500
  • 651•312•6618
  • People
  • Litigation
  • Successes
  • News
  • About
  • Fee Arrangements
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • People
  • Litigation
  • Successes
  • News
  • About
  • Fee Arrangements
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • PEOPLE
  • LITIGATION
    • APPEALS
    • COMPLEX COMMERCIAL LITIGATION
    • EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION
    • FRAUD AND FIDUCIARY DUTY
    • FINANCIAL LITIGATION
    • OWNER/SHAREHOLDER DISPUTES
    • PLAINTIFF CONTINGENCY CASES
    • PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE
    • REAL ESTATE LITIGATION
    • TRUSTS AND ESTATES LAW
  • SUCCESSES
  • NEWS
  • ABOUT
  • FEE ARRANGEMENTS
  • PEOPLE
  • LITIGATION
    • APPEALS
    • COMPLEX COMMERCIAL LITIGATION
    • EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION
    • FRAUD AND FIDUCIARY DUTY
    • FINANCIAL LITIGATION
    • OWNER/SHAREHOLDER DISPUTES
    • PLAINTIFF CONTINGENCY CASES
    • PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE
    • REAL ESTATE LITIGATION
    • TRUSTS AND ESTATES LAW
  • SUCCESSES
  • NEWS
  • ABOUT
  • FEE ARRANGEMENTS
search
disclaimer
Linkedin
Join Our Email List

© 2021 ANTHONY OSTLUND LOUWAGIE DRESSEN BOYLAN P.A. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT