Skip to content
  • CAREERS
  • CONTACT US
Search
Close this search box.
anthony ostlund logo
  • PEOPLE
  • LITIGATION
    • APPEALS
    • COMPLEX COMMERCIAL LITIGATION
    • EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION
    • FRAUD AND FIDUCIARY DUTY
    • FINANCIAL LITIGATION
    • OWNER/SHAREHOLDER DISPUTES
    • PLAINTIFF CONTINGENCY CASES
    • PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE
    • REAL ESTATE LITIGATION
    • TRUSTS AND ESTATES LAW
  • SUCCESSES
  • NEWS
  • ABOUT
  • FEE ARRANGEMENTS
Menu
  • PEOPLE
  • LITIGATION
    • APPEALS
    • COMPLEX COMMERCIAL LITIGATION
    • EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION
    • FRAUD AND FIDUCIARY DUTY
    • FINANCIAL LITIGATION
    • OWNER/SHAREHOLDER DISPUTES
    • PLAINTIFF CONTINGENCY CASES
    • PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE
    • REAL ESTATE LITIGATION
    • TRUSTS AND ESTATES LAW
  • SUCCESSES
  • NEWS
  • ABOUT
  • FEE ARRANGEMENTS

Closing Time: The Impact of Covid-19 on Bar and Restaurant Leases

  • March 26, 2020
March 26, 2020
Minnesota Lawyer and Finance & Commerce – Partner Content
Author: Philip J. Kaplan

 

To prevent the spread of Covid-19, state and local governments are restricting business operations that depend on large gatherings of people. Minnesota Governor Tim Walz has issued an executive order closing bars and restaurants (except for takeout service) throughout Minnesota. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey has made a similar emergency declaration for the city. It is unclear when the restrictions will be lifted.
Even a temporary closure of bars and restaurants will be economically devastating. At a time when bars and restaurants have limited or no ability to generate revenue, their expenses will continue to mount. Among other costs, many bars and restaurants lease their spaces and pay thousands – even tens of thousands – of dollars per month in rent. During and after the shutdown, a lot of these businesses will be unable to meet the payment obligations in their leases.
As they manage the Covid-19 crisis, bar and restaurant tenants and their landlords should take all of the following steps:

Check Insurance Coverage

Every bar and restaurant that has been closed during the Covid-19 pandemic should immediately check its insurance coverage. Landlords should ask their bar and restaurant tenants about insurance as well. Does the tenant have business interruption insurance or any other type of policy that might apply?
Is the landlord named as an additional insured? What types of losses are covered? What are the policy limits? What does the policyholder need to do to preserve its insurance claims?
Review the Lease
Bar and restaurant tenants and their landlords should also review their lease agreements. The Covid-19 emergency is so unique that it is hard to imagine a lease provision speaking to this specific situation. But it is possible that some general lease provisions will govern.
Did either the landlord or the tenant explicitly or implicitly assume the risk of an unanticipated catastrophe? Does the lease have a force majeure clause? Does the lease have a “go dark” clause? Does the lease say anything about what the parties are allowed or required do if the government restricts the tenant’s ability to use the premises as intended?
Consider Legal Defenses
Assuming the lease agreement does not clearly define the tenant’s rights and obligations in light of Covid-19, both the landlord and the tenant should consider whether the tenant has any legal excuses for non-payment of rent.
Minnesota courts recognize defenses of impracticability and frustration of purpose, which provide relief from contractual obligations under certain circumstances. Impracticability applies when an unforeseen event negates a basic assumption underlying the contract and makes it impracticable for a party to perform. Similarly, frustration of purpose applies when an unforeseen event defeats both a basic assumption underlying the contract and one party’s primary purpose for entering into the agreement. The main difference between the defenses is that frustration of purpose does not depend on the parties’ practical ability to perform. In other words, a party may be relieved of its contractual duties due to frustration of purpose even if it could find a way to satisfy its obligations. Impracticability or frustration of purpose can be permanent or temporary, complete or partial.
Government-mandated business closures, wars, and significant safety fears have supported such defenses in the past.
Although the case law provides some loose analogies to our current situation, the availability of legal excuses for bar and restaurant tenants will be fact-specific. Is the tenant’s business completely closed or is it open for takeout? How significant is the tenant’s takeout business? Is the tenant experiencing a shortage in product supply? How long will the government restrictions last? Will the tenant’s business be in a position to operate once the government restrictions end? Even if the tenant can legally operate, will it remain closed for a period due to safety or health concerns?
In an ideal world, businesses will work through the Covid-19 crisis together and find ways to soften the economic blow that everyone is feeling. But some will not be able to find common ground, making litigation inevitable. Bar and restaurant tenants and their landlords should hope for the best and prepare for the worst.

related attorneys

Loading...

Philip J. Kaplan

related practice areas

Loading...
AO-logo-initials

90 SOUTH 7TH STREET, SUITE 3600
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402
P 612.349.6969       F 612.349.6996

 

© 2021 ANTHONY OSTLUND LOUWAGIE DRESSEN BOYLAN P.A.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

  • 651•312•6500
  • 651•312•6618
  • People
  • Litigation
  • Successes
  • News
  • About
  • Fee Arrangements
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • People
  • Litigation
  • Successes
  • News
  • About
  • Fee Arrangements
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • PEOPLE
  • LITIGATION
    • APPEALS
    • COMPLEX COMMERCIAL LITIGATION
    • EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION
    • FRAUD AND FIDUCIARY DUTY
    • FINANCIAL LITIGATION
    • OWNER/SHAREHOLDER DISPUTES
    • PLAINTIFF CONTINGENCY CASES
    • PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE
    • REAL ESTATE LITIGATION
    • TRUSTS AND ESTATES LAW
  • SUCCESSES
  • NEWS
  • ABOUT
  • FEE ARRANGEMENTS
  • PEOPLE
  • LITIGATION
    • APPEALS
    • COMPLEX COMMERCIAL LITIGATION
    • EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION
    • FRAUD AND FIDUCIARY DUTY
    • FINANCIAL LITIGATION
    • OWNER/SHAREHOLDER DISPUTES
    • PLAINTIFF CONTINGENCY CASES
    • PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE
    • REAL ESTATE LITIGATION
    • TRUSTS AND ESTATES LAW
  • SUCCESSES
  • NEWS
  • ABOUT
  • FEE ARRANGEMENTS
search
disclaimer
Linkedin
Join Our Email List

© 2021 ANTHONY OSTLUND LOUWAGIE DRESSEN BOYLAN P.A. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT