Skip to content
  • CAREERS
  • CONTACT US
Search
Close
anthony ostlund logo
  • PEOPLE
  • LITIGATION
    • APPEALS
    • COMPLEX COMMERCIAL LITIGATION
    • EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION
    • FRAUD AND FIDUCIARY DUTY
    • FINANCIAL LITIGATION
    • OWNER/SHAREHOLDER DISPUTES
    • PLAINTIFF CONTINGENCY CASES
    • PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE
    • REAL ESTATE LITIGATION
    • TRUSTS AND ESTATES LAW
  • SUCCESSES
  • NEWS
  • ABOUT
  • FEE ARRANGEMENTS
Menu
  • PEOPLE
  • LITIGATION
    • APPEALS
    • COMPLEX COMMERCIAL LITIGATION
    • EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION
    • FRAUD AND FIDUCIARY DUTY
    • FINANCIAL LITIGATION
    • OWNER/SHAREHOLDER DISPUTES
    • PLAINTIFF CONTINGENCY CASES
    • PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE
    • REAL ESTATE LITIGATION
    • TRUSTS AND ESTATES LAW
  • SUCCESSES
  • NEWS
  • ABOUT
  • FEE ARRANGEMENTS

AO Teams Recognized with Two Attorney of the Year Awards

  • December 28, 2022

Anthony Ostlund’s reputation for success in complex cases and commitment to our clients and our community is no better exemplified than by the work concluded this year by two teams of our firm’s attorneys. By doing what we do best—achieving significant, hard-won victories for our clients—the teams behind successful outcomes in Koch v. Koch and Murphy, et al. v. Harpstead have both received 2022 Attorney of the Year Awards in Minnesota Lawyer’s annual recognition of remarkable achievements in the legal profession.

 

While the results are highlighted this year, the work on both cases has been ongoing since the mid 2010s.

 

Jim Koch v. SKT/Koch Trucking, Randy Koch and Dave Koch

 

Richard T. Ostlund, Randy Gullickson, Shannon Awsumb, Joe Janochoski, and paraprofessional Shannon Flinn wrapped this landmark case with our client receiving a total award of nearly $75 million, the largest total award in Minnesota history to a minority shareholder seeking damages and a court ordered “fair value” buy-out of their ownership in a Minnesota closely held company.

 

The Koch case spanned five years, with our Anthony Ostlund trial team locked in what Fourth District Judge Laurie Miller described as a “war”—where the defendant control group employed three law firms to fight virtually every issue. Judge Miller awarded Jim Koch $58.5 million for his shares, while also affirming a jury’s award of $12 million to Jim Koch against all four defendants based upon a lack of good faith and breach of contract. In awarding Jim Koch over $2 million in fees and expenses, Judge Miller declared that Jim Koch “won the war,” finding the court and jury had awarded him everything he sought in this case.

 

At trial, Defendants opposed a share buy-out and asked the judge to find the value of Jim’s ownership to be less than $30 million.  After the jury awarded Jim $12 million for breach of contract and lack of good faith, Defendants conceded the buy-out claim, and attempted to convince the judge to award Jim less than $25 million for his stock over 20 years.  Judge Miller refused to do so, instead awarding Jim $58.5 million—the top value stated by Jim’s appraiser for 2017—the presumptive buy-out valuation date under Minnesota law.  In then awarding Jim over $2 million in fees and expenses, Judge Miller ruled:  “Defendant’s suggestion that Plaintiff’s fee recovery…should be reduced for lack of success is puzzling.  The jury gave him everything he asked for, and more, . . . .  The jury rejected every defense Defendants raised . . . .”

 

Murphy et al. v. Harpstead

 

In conjunction with attorneys from Mid Minnesota Legal Aid and Nichols Kaster, AO attorneys Peter McElligott and Steven Pincus (now retired) secured a successful settlement in the significant federal court civil rights case, Murphy et al. v. Harpstead. On July 27, 2022, District Judge Donovan Frank granted preliminary approval to the settlement agreement reached by the parties, nearing the end of a six-year fight for the rights of a class of people with disabilities living in group homes. The class sought simply to live more independent and integrated lives of their own choosing in the community. The settlement provides important structural relief, including a requirement that people with disabilities living in group homes who request an opportunity to live independently be provided with access to services to help meet that goal.

 

The settlement also includes an agreement by the Department of Human Services to pay $1.138 million in attorneys’ fees and costs, which is the largest attorneys’ fees award received by Mid-Minnesota Legal Aid in its more than 100-year history. Anthony Ostlund and Nichols Kaster handled this case on a pro bono basis and donated all attorneys’ fees to Legal Aid.

 

The case consisted of constitutional claims under the 14th Amendment, the ADA, the Rehabilitation Act, and the Medicaid Act. The legal team overcame a motion to dismiss, obtained class certification, prevailed in an attempted interlocutory review, defeated a summary judgment motion and motions to exclude Plaintiffs’ experts, and succeeded on Plaintiffs’ own partial summary judgment motion.

 

After multiple rounds of mediation with the magistrate judge and lengthy delays due to COVID–which has had a disproportionate effect on members of the class–the case was set for trial on July 11th. Shortly before trial, the parties participated in a two-day mediation with retired Judge James Rosenbaum and arrived at the present settlement. Subject to final approval, the result for the class and all impacted individuals is significant, life changing and rights-affirming. Along with co-counsel, Anthony Ostlund is proud to have made real and meaningful change in our community.

 

Anthony Ostlund’s Attorneys of the Year

 

The Koch and Murphy teams will be honored at Minnesota Lawyer’s event on February 15th, 2023. Previous Anthony Ostlund Attorney of the Year recipients include:

 

  • Shareholders Joe Anthony and Dan Hall were recognized in 2020 for their successful defense of a $42 million breach of fiduciary duty claim. Joe and Dan defended the trustee of an irrevocable trust in a twenty-day bench trial, which resulted in a complete dismissal of all claims against their client.
  • Shareholder and CEO Janel Dressen for her representation of Kim Lund in an ownership buyout dispute involving Twin Cities based Lunds supermarket. In 2017, Ms. Lund was awarded $45.2 million for her buy out interest, the largest fair value buyout on record in Minnesota.
  • Retired Shareholder Norman Baer, in 2013, garnered a settlement offer of $17.1 million for Anthony Ostlund client Minneapolis Venture—an increase of $4.15 million over the original offer from the Minnesota Sports Facility Authority.
  • Shareholder Richard Ostlund was honored in 2009 for two multi-million dollar recoveries. The first was a recovery of $73 million in an action involving claims of fraud against the developer of a $200-million luxury residential development and the second was a recovery of $62 million in cash and property in a family business litigation trial in Minnesota.
  • Shareholder Vince Louwagie was honored in 2008 for winning a $1.6 million verdict for his client, an attorney who accused his former firm of fraudulently distributing fees deriving from a class-action settlement.
  • Shareholder Joe Anthony achieved a $130 million verdict in 2007 on behalf of Park Dental and Dental Specialist clinics — professional associations composed of 115 dentists — against its administrative service provider, American Dental Partners, Inc. and its local subsidiary, PDHC, Ltd.

 

related attorneys

Loading...

Joseph W. Anthony

Shannon M. Awsumb

Janel M. Dressen

Shannon L. Flinn

Randy G. Gullickson

Dan Hall

1 2 Next »

related practice areas

Loading...
AO-logo-initials

90 SOUTH 7TH STREET, SUITE 3600
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402
P 612.349.6969       F 612.349.6996

 

© 2021 ANTHONY OSTLUND LOUWAGIE DRESSEN BOYLAN P.A.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

  • 651•312•6500
  • 651•312•6618
  • People
  • Litigation
  • Successes
  • News
  • About
  • Fee Arrangements
  • Careers
  • Contact
Menu
  • People
  • Litigation
  • Successes
  • News
  • About
  • Fee Arrangements
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • PEOPLE
  • LITIGATION
    • APPEALS
    • COMPLEX COMMERCIAL LITIGATION
    • EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION
    • FRAUD AND FIDUCIARY DUTY
    • FINANCIAL LITIGATION
    • OWNER/SHAREHOLDER DISPUTES
    • PLAINTIFF CONTINGENCY CASES
    • PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE
    • REAL ESTATE LITIGATION
    • TRUSTS AND ESTATES LAW
  • SUCCESSES
  • NEWS
  • ABOUT
  • FEE ARRANGEMENTS
Menu
  • PEOPLE
  • LITIGATION
    • APPEALS
    • COMPLEX COMMERCIAL LITIGATION
    • EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION
    • FRAUD AND FIDUCIARY DUTY
    • FINANCIAL LITIGATION
    • OWNER/SHAREHOLDER DISPUTES
    • PLAINTIFF CONTINGENCY CASES
    • PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE
    • REAL ESTATE LITIGATION
    • TRUSTS AND ESTATES LAW
  • SUCCESSES
  • NEWS
  • ABOUT
  • FEE ARRANGEMENTS
search
disclaimer
Linkedin
Join Our Email List

© 2021 ANTHONY OSTLUND LOUWAGIE DRESSEN BOYLAN P.A. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT